COVID-19 vaccination and carditis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with the development of carditis, especially in children and adolescent males. However, the rates of these events in the global setting have not been explored in a systematic manner. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the rates of carditis in children and adolescents receiving COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and several Latin American databases were searched for studies. The number of events, and where available, at-risk populations were extracted. Rate ratios were calculated and expressed as a rate per million doses received. Subgroup analysis based on the dose administered was performed. Subjects ≤ 19 years old who developed pericarditis or myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination were included. RESULTS: A total of 369 entries were retrieved. After screening, 39 articles were included. Our meta-analysis found that 343 patients developed carditis after the administration of 12,602,625 COVID-19 vaccination doses (pooled rate per million: 37.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.57, 59.19). The rate of carditis was higher amongst male patients (pooled rate ratio: 5.04; 95% CI 1.40, 18.19) and after the second vaccination dose (pooled rate ratio: 5.60; 95% CI 1.97, 15.89). In 301 cases of carditis (281 male; mean age: 15.90 (standard deviation [SD] 1.52) years old) reported amongst the case series/reports, 261 patients were reported to have received treatment. 97.34% of the patients presented with chest pain. The common findings include ST elevation and T wave abnormalities on electrocardiography. Oedema and late gadolinium enhancement in the myocardium were frequently observed in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). The mean length of hospital stay was 3.91 days (SD 1.75). In 298 out of 299 patients (99.67%) the carditis resolved with or without treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Carditis is a rare complication after COVID-19 vaccination across the globe, but the vast majority of episodes are self-limiting with rapid resolution of symptoms within days. Central illustration. Balancing the benefits of vaccines on COVID-19-caused carditis and post-vaccination carditis.

A rare presentation of a patient with COVID-19: Cardiac tamponade.

The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, can range from only mild, flu-like symptoms to severe progressive pneumonia. Cardiac involvement may be observed during the course of the infection and may include myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiac rhythm disturbances, but cases describing cardiac tamponade in patients previously diagnosed with COVID-19 are very rare. A 58-year-old female had been hospitalized in another hospital 2 weeks prior to the currently described presentation due to atypical pneumonia. A nasopharyngeal swab specimen was positive for COVID-19. The hospitalization was uncomplicated and she was discharged after a week. She presented at our emergency department with symptoms of shortness of breath and swelling in both legs. A bedside transthoracic echocardiography showed globally depressed left ventricular contraction with an ejection fraction of 30% and there was significant pericardial effusion, which surrounded the entire heart and restricted diastolic filling. The patient was admitted to the coronary intensive care unit with the diagnosis of pericardial tamponade. Bedside pericardiocentesis was performed and serohemorrhagic fluid was drained. Pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 exhibiting dyspnea or worsening of dyspnea. A 58-year-old female has been hospitalized in another hospital two weeks ago due to atypical pneumonia. Her nasopharyngeal swab specimen was positive for COVID-19. She had an uncomplicated course during the hospitalization and was discharged a week ago. She presented to our emergency department (ED) with symptoms of shortness of breath and swelling in both legs. We performed bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) which showed globally depressed left ventricular contraction with ejection fraction (EF) of 30% and there was significant pericardial effusion which surrounded the entire heart and restricted diastolic filling. The patient was admitted to the coronary intensive care unit (CICU) with the diagnosis of pericardial tamponade. Bedside pericardiosentesis was performed and serohemorrhagic fluid was drained. Patients with COVID-19 infection who develops or have worsening dyspnea, pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade should be considered in differential diagnosis.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has resulted in a health crisis and a significant number of deaths worldwide. The full effect on access to medical care and the treatment for patients with chronic diseases and acute conditions is still unknown. This is an investigation of access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for patients diagnosed with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the pandemic. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with STEMI and underwent PPCI during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic were included in the study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of the patients were assessed. A control group of patients diagnosed with STEMI and who underwent PPCI during the same time interval a year prior to the outbreak of the disease was analyzed retrospectively for comparison. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the number of STEMI cases during the COVID-19 crisis period. Furthermore, these patients had a prolonged ischemic time; they were more likely to have a longer pain-to-balloon (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-10.2) and door-to-balloon time (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 3.1-22.8). CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with STEMI during the pandemic experienced a significant delay between the onset of symptoms and PPCI.